Datum: 2024-02-15 Verleger: 紫鸽电气 Durchsuche: 100
From inside the Norway, a gender-natural , replacement a laws with the Joined Connection which had been introduced into the 1993 (Ministry off College students, Equality and you may Public Introduction 2009a, b). This new laws secured equivalent marriage and you may parenting rights getting lesbian, gay and you will heterosexual partners, like the straight to get adoption. Lesbian people was granted the ability to feel assessed getting condition-paid phony insemination actions and you may co-motherhood could well be provided to brand new spouse of your Zug escorts own physiological mommy. The brand new Norwegian county church or any other spiritual communities from inside the Norway hired reservation legal rights with regards to church wedding receptions. Ministers and you can priests were given ideal, although not the responsibility, to perform marriages having same-sex couples (Ministry regarding College students, Equality and you will Personal Introduction 2009a, b). This particular article accounts results out-of a nationwide data examining Norwegian thinking throughout the equivalent marriage and you can parenting liberties to possess lesbian, gay and heterosexual lovers and hobbies off children which have lesbian and you may gay parents.
Inside Norway, we have witnessed several changes in this new judge position of homosexuals due to the fact removal of male homosexuality regarding Unlawful Code in the 1972. Twenty years later, if Legislation towards Joined Connection are brought, lesbian and you may gay couples were most importantly offered a comparable court legal rights while the heterosexual couples with the exception of church wedding events, mutual use and condition-backed assisted fertilization (Halvorsen 1998). The new , in addition, put modern statutes away from such as for example legal rights, and it makes no variation based on gender, apart from scheduling legal rights in terms of church wedding parties. Now, Norway represents perhaps one of the most liberal places regarding the community regarding securing equivalent legal rights to have heterosexuals and you may homosexuals (Anderssen and you can Hellesund 2009; Badgett 2004) and are the initial one of many Nordic regions introducing an excellent gender-basic Matrimony Act. This will make Norway a fascinating case to review much more directly.
The public debate at that time leading up to Norway’s the new gender-neutral Wedding Law secured a spectrum of topics regarding elizabeth-sex people, however, generally centred toward lesbian and gay parenthood (Folgero, 2008) and you can when it was in the fresh new newborns best interest to provide lesbian and gay couples the ability to feel parents. Opponents of your own the fresh Relationship Laws debated that the proposal is maybe not when you look at the arrangement into needs of one’s child and you will you to definitely lesbian and you can gay liberties (adult rights) received priority more children’s liberties. The new opinion you to increasing up with lesbian and gay parents carry out place an extra filters or load to the child are subsequent marketed. Biological securities and you may an effective heterosexual nuclear friends with both male and you will female role designs was basically considered requirements to have a healthy environment to own children (Anderssen and you may Hellesund 2009; Folgero 2008; Proposition nr. 33 2007–2008). Followers of your own proposition, at the same time, highlighted the same liberties and you can a justice angle. They argued the gender-neutral Matrimony Rules manage support independence out-of discrimination getting pupils elevated in the lesbian and you may gay relationship while in standard stopping prejudiced and moralizing impression concerning lesbian and you can gay parenting and you can youngsters expanding right up which have lesbian and you will gay mothers. Supporters subsequent conveyed a conviction one to a parent’s sexual direction are not related to their particular/their capability to provide an excellent and you can caring ecosystem to own youngsters (Folgero 2008; Offer nr. 33 2007–2008). Conversely, various teams contended there was lack of lookup for the outcomes to have pupils following specifications to possess equivalent parenting rights to possess lesbian, gay and you can heterosexual lovers regarding the the new gender-natural Relationship Law which these had not received sufficient planning. 2005).
